Snapshot-Sleuth Performance Metrics
Processing Time Comparison: Legacy vs. Automated
| Snapshot Size | Legacy Manual (avg) | Automated System | Improvement | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 GB | ~35 minutes | ~10 minutes | 71% | 25 min |
| 50 GB | ~90 minutes | ~25 minutes | 72% | 65 min |
| 100 GB | ~2.5 hours | ~45 minutes | 70% | 1.75 hr |
| 500 GB | ~6 hours | ~1.5 hours | 75% | 4.5 hr |
| 1 TB | ~10 hours | ~2.5 hours | 75% | 7.5 hr |
| 2 TB | ~16 hours | ~4.5 hours | 72% | 11.5 hr |
| 5 TB | ~24+ hours | ~8 hours | 67% | 16+ hr |
Average Improvement: 71%
System Impact Metrics
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Total Snapshots Processed | 100+ | Since system launch |
| Incidents Supported | 50+ | Security investigations |
| Team Adoption Rate | 90% | Active users on security team |
| Root Cause Identification | 65% | Cases where automation identified root cause |
| Total Time Saved | 150+ hours | Cumulative analyst time recovered |
| Manual Steps Eliminated | 12 | Per-snapshot processing tasks |
Codebase Metrics
| Component | Count | Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Total Lines of Code | ~25,000 | TypeScript, Python, React |
| Infrastructure Stacks | 16 | AWS CDK |
| Lambda Functions | 30+ | TypeScript (21), Python (9) |
| CloudWatch Dashboards | 8 | Specialized monitoring |
| AWS Regions Deployed | 20+ | Commercial, GovCloud, China |
| Forensic Tools Integrated | 4 | YARA, ClamAV, Artifact Collector, Timeline Generator |
Tool Execution Performance
| Tool | Average Runtime | Files Processed | Detection Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YARA Scanner | 15-45 min | Entire filesystem | Pattern matching |
| ClamAV Scanner | 20-60 min | Entire filesystem | Malware signatures |
| Artifact Collector | 5-15 min | Key locations | IOC extraction |
| Timeline Generator | 30-90 min | System artifacts | Temporal analysis |
Resource Efficiency
| Resource | Configuration | Cost Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| EC2 Instance Type | m7g.4xlarge (Graviton) | 40% cost reduction vs x86 |
| Lambda Memory | 10 GB | Optimized for snapshot handling |
| S3 Storage Class | Intelligent Tiering | Auto-transitions to Glacier |
| Evidence Retention | 365 days | Lifecycle policies |
Availability & Reliability
| Metric | Target | Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow Success Rate | 95% | 97% |
| Average Latency to Start | < 5 min | 2.3 min |
| Dashboard Availability | 99.9% | 99.95% |
| Test Coverage (Canary) | Hourly | Hourly |
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
71%
Faster Processing
Processing Time Reduction
150+
Hours Saved
Cumulative Analyst Time
90%
Adoption
Team Utilization Rate
65%
Root Cause
Automated Identification
Processing Time by Snapshot Size
The chart below illustrates the dramatic reduction in processing time achieved through automation:
Processing Time (hours)
│
24 ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ▓▓▓▓▓▓ Legacy (5TB)
│
16 ├───────────────────────────────────────────── ▓▓▓▓▓▓ Legacy (2TB)
│
10 ├─────────────────────────────────── ▓▓▓▓▓▓ Legacy (1TB)
│ ████████ Automated (5TB)
8 ├────────────────────────────────────
│
6 ├──────────────────────────── ▓▓▓▓▓▓ Legacy (500GB)
│
4 ├────────────────── ████████ Automated (2TB)
│
2 ├───────── ▓▓▓▓▓▓ Legacy (100GB) ████████ Automated (1TB)
│ ████████ Automated (500GB)
1 ├──── ████████ Automated (100GB)
│ ▓▓▓▓ Legacy (8GB)
0 └──████────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
8GB 50GB 100GB 500GB 1TB 2TB 5TB
Snapshot Size
▓▓▓▓ Legacy Manual ████ Automated System
Architectural Impact on Performance
Parallel Execution Benefits
The move from serial to parallel tool execution accounts for the majority of time savings:
| Approach | 1TB Snapshot | Tool Execution |
|---|---|---|
| Serial (Legacy) | 10 hours | YARA → ClamAV → Artifacts → Timeline |
| Parallel (Automated) | 2.5 hours | All tools run simultaneously |
Compute Optimization
Graviton ARM64 instances provide:
- 40% better price-performance vs comparable x86 instances
- Consistent performance for I/O-intensive forensic operations
- Lower power consumption for sustained workloads
Regional Processing Benefits
Processing evidence in-region eliminates:
- Cross-region data transfer latency
- Data sovereignty compliance issues
- Network bandwidth bottlenecks